Section I
The Torah's Forbidden Birds
The list appears twice — in Leviticus 11:13–19 and Deuteronomy 14:12–18.
Unlike mammals and fish, the Torah does not give signs for kosher birds. Instead, it names the birds that are forbidden; the Sages then formulate signs for identifying permitted birds.
The list follows. Each name links to its specimen row in Part B, where verse text, verified commentary, and modern candidates are laid out in detail. Identifications vary in confidence — that variation, documented in Part B, is the reason the Sages introduced signs and mesorah.
Torah · Leviticus 11:13–19 (verbatim)
וְאֶת־אֵלֶּה תְּשַׁקְּצוּ מִן־הָעוֹף לֹא יֵאָכְלוּ שֶׁקֶץ הֵם: אֶת־הַנֶּשֶׁר וְאֶת־הַפֶּרֶס וְאֵת הָעׇזְנִיָּה׃ וְאֶת־הַדָּאָה וְאֶת־הָאַיָּה לְמִינָהּ׃ אֵת כׇּל־עֹרֵב לְמִינוֹ׃ וְאֵת בַּת הַיַּעֲנָה וְאֶת־הַתַּחְמָס וְאֶת־הַשָּׁחַף וְאֶת־הַנֵּץ לְמִינֵהוּ׃ וְאֶת־הַכּוֹס וְאֶת־הַשָּׁלָךְ וְאֶת־הַיַּנְשׁוּף׃ וְאֶת־הַתִּנְשֶׁמֶת וְהַקָּאָת וְהָרָחָם׃ וְהַחֲסִידָה הָאֲנָפָה לְמִינָהּ וְהַדּוּכִיפַת וְהָעֲטַלֵּף׃
The Twenty Head-Terms
| 1 | נֶשֶׁר | nesher | griffon vulture / eagle | View in B |
| 2 | פֶּרֶס | peres | bearded vulture / lammergeier | View in B |
| 3 | עׇזְנִיָּה | ozniyah | sea eagle / black vulture | View in B |
| 4 | דָּאָה / רָאָה | da'ah / ra'ah | one species per Chullin 63b | View in B |
| 5 | אַיָּה / דַּיָּה | ayah / dayah | one species per Chullin 63b | View in B |
| 6 | עֹרֵב | orev | raven (base term) | View in B |
| 7 | בַּת הַיַּעֲנָה | bat ha-ya'anah | ostrich (trad.) | View in B |
| 8 | תַּחְמָס | tachmas | unresolved | View in B |
| 9 | שָׁחָף | shachaf | unresolved | View in B |
| 10 | נֵץ | netz | hawk / sparrowhawk | View in B |
| 11 | כּוֹס | kos | owl (Rashi owl-pair) | View in B |
| 12 | שָׁלָךְ | shalach | fish-catching bird (unresolved) | View in B |
| 13 | יַנְשׁוּף | yanshuf | owl (Rashi owl-pair) | View in B |
| 14 | תִּנְשֶׁמֶת | tinshemet | Rashi's לעז: bat (unresolved) | View in B |
| 15 | קָאָת | ka'at | Gemara: קוק (unidentified) | View in B |
| 16 | רָחָם | racham | Gemara: שרקרק (unidentified) | View in B |
| 17 | חֲסִידָה | chasidah | stork (via Rashi's לעז) | View in B |
| 18 | אֲנָפָה | anafah | heron (via Rashi's לעז) | View in B |
| 19 | דּוּכִיפַת | duchifat | hoopoe | View in B |
| 20 | עֲטַלֵּף | atalef | bat | View in B |
The Torah also uses four למינה / למינו / למינהו family-expansion clauses on da'ah/ra'ah, orev, netz, and anafah. This guide renders those clauses as family-expansion rows so the presentation matches the Talmudic count of 24. See Part B's family-expansion rows.
↑ Top
Section II
The Four Signs
The Sages' working rules for identifying kosher birds, derived from the forbidden list itself.
Since the Torah gave no positive signs for kosher birds, the Sages in Mishnah Chullin 3:6 stated four working rules — one negative (dores, "seizes prey") and three positive (etzba yeseira, zefek, kurkevan niklaf). The Mishnah is reproduced below verbatim.
Of the four, dores is the one whose definition is most debated. Rashi on Chullin 59a and Tosafot on Chullin 61a take different positions, both reproduced below verbatim from Sefaria. The other three signs are named in the Mishnah itself; no verbatim Rashi definitions were located for reproduction here.
Mishnah · Chullin 3:6 (verbatim)
Mishnah (folio 59a)
סִימָנֵי בְּהֵמָה וְחַיָּה נֶאֶמְרוּ מִן הַתּוֹרָה, וְסִימָנֵי הָעוֹף לֹא נֶאֶמְרוּ. אֲבָל אָמְרוּ חֲכָמִים: כָּל עוֹף הַדּוֹרֵס — טָמֵא. כֹּל שֶׁיֶּשׁ לוֹ אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה, וְזֶפֶק, וְקֻרְקְבָנוֹ נִקְלָף — טָהוֹר. רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר בַּר צָדוֹק אוֹמֵר: כָּל עוֹף הַחוֹלֵק אֶת רַגְלָיו — טָמֵא.
Sign I
דּוֹרֵס
dores
— "seizes prey" (the negative sign)
Rashi on Chullin 59a (verbatim)
Rashi
שֶׁאוֹחֵז בְּצִפּוֹרְנָיו וּמַגְבִּיהַּ מִן הַקַּרְקַע מַה שֶּׁאוֹכֵל.
This Rashi text is independently preserved in Tosafot on Chullin 61a (below), which quotes Rashi by name using the exact same wording.
Tosafot on Chullin 61a (verbatim — citing Rabbeinu Tam)
Tosafot, citing Rabbeinu Tam
הַדּוֹרֵס — פֵּירֵשׁ בַּקּוּנְטְרֵס שֶׁאוֹחֵז בְּצִפּוֹרְנָיו וּמַגְבִּיהַּ מִן הַקַּרְקַע מַה שֶׁאוֹכֵל, וְקָשֶׁה לְרַבֵּינוּ תָּם דְּהָא אֲפִילּוּ תַּרְנְגוֹלֶת עוֹשָׂה כֵן, וּמְפָרֵשׁ רַבֵּינוּ תָּם — דּוֹרֵס וְאוֹכֵל מֵחַיִּים וְאֵינוֹ מַמְתִּין לָהּ עַד שֶׁתָּמוּת.
Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam (as Tosafot reports him) differ on what dores describes. The two quotes stand side by side; a reader can compare them directly.
Sign II
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה
etzba yeseira
— "extra toe"
The Mishnah names etzba yeseira but does not elaborate on which toe is meant. Later authorities discuss this; no verbatim Rashi definition was located for reproduction here. See the Further Study note at the end of this section.
Sign III
זֶפֶק
zefek
— "crop"
A pouch in the esophagus where food is softened before digestion. The Mishnah names the feature; no verbatim Rashi definition was located for reproduction here.
Sign IV
קֻרְקְבָנוֹ נִקְלָף
kurkevan niklaf
— "gizzard that can be peeled"
The muscular stomach has an inner lining. In kosher birds the lining peels away by hand. The Mishnah names this; no verbatim Rashi definition was located for reproduction here.
Further Study
Later authorities debate the precise definitions of the four signs, especially דורס. This guide presents only views reproduced from directly verifiable source text.
↑ Top
Section III
Why Mesorah Decides
Later halakhic practice treats signs as necessary but not sufficient.
The four signs provide the Mishnah's framework for identifying permitted birds, but this guide does not present them as a standalone practical ruling system.
Later halakhic practice treats mesorah as decisive in many bird-identification cases. This guide does not reproduce the decisor texts here; see Further Study.
This is why the identification debates in Part B are presented as source-critical and zoological, not as practical kashrut rulings.
New bird species encountered in new regions are outside the scope of this guide's practical conclusions. For applied halakhah, consult the decisor texts listed below.
Note
This section describes the halakhic framework at a high level. No specific rulings are reproduced. For decisor texts see the reading list in Further Study, specifically Rambam Hilchot Ma'achalot Asurot 1:14–15 and Shulchan Aruch Yoreh De'ah 82.
↑ Top
This guide's sources policy is strict: every popup reproduces verbatim text with a Sefaria link, and paraphrases are not attributed to the Gemara or to specific Rishonim. That discipline means some views that appear in traditional Jewish educational materials are not reproduced here.
Readers who want the full picture should consult the following primary materials directly on Sefaria.
↑ Top
Verification Summary
Verbatim sources included in this document: Leviticus 11:13–19 (with Deuteronomy 14:12–18 cross-referenced); Mishnah Chullin 3:6 (folio 59a); Rashi on Chullin 59a (dores definition only); Tosafot on Chullin 61a (citing Rabbeinu Tam). No other Rishonim attributions appear. No paraphrases of the Gemara. No Rambam Peirush HaMishnayot or Saadia Gaon Tafsir citations anywhere in this three-part guide.
⚠ Sources Policy
Every Hebrew/Aramaic passage in this document is reproduced verbatim from a verified witness and linked to Sefaria. No English translations are provided inside popups — consult the Davidson Edition at each link. No paraphrases of the Gemara. No Old French gloss attributed to Rashi unless the לעז is present in standard printed witnesses. No attribution to Rambam's Peirush HaMishnayot or Saadia Gaon's Tafsir anywhere in this document.
Note on Rambam Peirush HaMishnayot (applies to all 24 rows)
The accessible manuscript witness of Rambam's Peirush HaMishnayot on Chullin is fragmentary and covers Mishnah 3:2–3 and 4:3–6 — not Mishnah 3:1, where the Torah bird list would be addressed. A Judeo-Arabic glossary of the 24 birds is therefore not retrievable from the accessible witness set. Because that evidence is unavailable, Rambam PM is omitted from the per-bird rows.
Confidence Tiers (Derived, Not Chosen)
Each row's confidence chip is computed from which sources are populated. Anchored (Rashi + Talmud) = both a Rashi לעז and a verbatim Talmudic passage. Talmudic-anchored = verbatim Talmudic passage only. Rashi-anchored = Rashi לעז only. Rashi-anchored (with caveat) = Rashi comment exists but carries a structural problem (owl-pair internal allocation, or תנשמת/עטלף conflict). Structural anchor only = named in the Talmud's structural count (Chullin 61b) but no lexical identification anchor. No lexical anchor = no Rashi, no verbatim Talmudic etymology, no structural reference in this dataset.
Jump to Row
Family-expansion rows (4)
Row 1
נֶשֶׁר
nesher
griffon vulture (mod.) / eagle (trad.)
Talmudic-anchored
Verse
אֶת־הַנֶּשֶׁר וְאֶת־הַפֶּרֶס וְאֵת הָעׇזְנִיָּה׃
Leviticus 11:13 · Deuteronomy 14:12
Talmud · Chullin 61b (24 birds, 4 signs)
גְּמִירִי עֶשְׂרִים וְאַרְבָּעָה עוֹפוֹת טְמֵאִים הָווּ וְאַרְבָּעָה סִימָנִין. תְּלָתָא הָדְרִי בְּכֻלְּהוּ עֶשְׂרִים מֵהֶם שְׁלֹשָׁה שְׁלֹשָׁה, וּתְרֵי בְּעוֹרֵב, חַד בְּפֶרֶס וְחַד בְּעׇזְנִיָּה.
This passage establishes the structural count (24 birds, 4 signs) and groups
נשר · פרס · עזניה. It is rendered once here and cross-referenced from the
peres and
ozniyah rows.
Modern Candidate
Gyps fulvus (Eurasian griffon vulture). Common modern candidate; no medieval לעז or Rambam PM anchor in this dataset.
Eurasian Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 2
פֶּרֶס
peres
bearded vulture / lammergeier
Structural anchor only
Verse
אֶת־הַנֶּשֶׁר וְאֶת־הַפֶּרֶס וְאֵת הָעׇזְנִיָּה׃
Leviticus 11:13 · Deuteronomy 14:12
Chullin 61b names
פרס as one of the two birds having exactly one of the four signs. See the verbatim 61b quote on the
nesher row above.
Modern Candidate
Gypaetus barbatus (bearded vulture / lammergeier). Common modern candidate; no Rashi לעז and no Rambam PM anchor in this dataset.
Bearded Vulture / Lammergeier (Gypaetus barbatus). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 3
עׇזְנִיָּה
ozniyah
sea eagle (trad.) / black vulture (mod.)
Structural anchor only
Verse
אֶת־הַנֶּשֶׁר וְאֶת־הַפֶּרֶס וְאֵת הָעׇזְנִיָּה׃
Leviticus 11:13 · Deuteronomy 14:12
Chullin 61b names
עזניה as the other bird with exactly one of the four signs. See the verbatim 61b quote on the
nesher row above.
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. Aegypius monachus (cinereous vulture) is the common modern candidate but carries no medieval לעז or Rambam PM anchor in this dataset.
Cinereous Vulture (Aegypius monachus). Traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 4
דָּאָה / רָאָה
da'ah / ra'ah
one species per Chullin 63b
Talmudic-anchored
Verses
וְאֶת־הַדָּאָה וְאֶת־הָאַיָּה לְמִינָהּ׃ (ויקרא)
וְהָרָאָה וְאֶת־הָאַיָּה וְהַדַּיָּה לְמִינָהּ׃ (דברים)
Leviticus 11:14 · Deuteronomy 14:13
Talmud · Chullin 63b (one-species derivation)
מִכְדִּי מִשְׁנֵה תּוֹרָה לְאוֹסוֹפֵי הוּא דְּאָתָא, מַאי שְׁנָא הָכָא דִּכְתִיב דָּאָה וּמַאי שְׁנָא הָכָא דִּכְתִיב רָאָה וְלָא כְתִיב דָּאָה? אֶלָּא שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ — מִין רָאָה וְדָאָה אַחַת הִיא.
Modern Candidate
Unresolved raptor complex. No Rashi לעז for this row.
Black Kite (Milvus migrans). Traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 5
אַיָּה / דַּיָּה
ayah / dayah
one species per Chullin 63b
Talmudic-anchored
Verses
Leviticus 11:14 (איה) · Deuteronomy 14:13 (איה · דיה)
Talmud · Chullin 63b (Abaye on parallel identification)
אָמַר אַבַּיֵי: כְּשֵׁם שֶׁרָאָה וְדָאָה אַחַת הִיא, כָּךְ אַיָּה וְדַיָּה אַחַת הִיא.
Talmud · Chullin 63b (Rabbi on the multiple names)
כִּדְתַנְיָא: רַבִּי אוֹמֵר: אֶקְרָא אֲנִי אַיָּה, דַּיָּה לָמָּה נֶאֶמְרָה? כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא תִּתֵּן פִּתְחוֹן פֶּה לְבַעַל דִּין לַחֲלֹק — שֶׁלֹּא תְּהֵא אַתָּה קוֹרֵא אַיָּה וְהוּא קוֹרֵא דַּיָּה.
Modern Candidate
Unresolved raptor complex. No Rashi לעז.
Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus). Traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 6
עֹרֵב
orev
raven (base term)
Talmudic-anchored
Verse
אֵת כׇּל־עֹרֵב לְמִינוֹ׃
Leviticus 11:15 · Deuteronomy 14:14
Talmud · Chullin 63a ("black as a raven")
אָמַר מָר: עוֹרֵב זֶה עוֹרֵב. אַטּוּ קַמַּן קָאֵי? אֶלָּא אֵימָא עוֹרֵב זֶה עוֹרֵב אוּכְמָא. וְכֵן הוּא אוֹמֵר: קְוֻצּוֹתָיו תַּלְתַּלִּים שְׁחֹרוֹת כָּעוֹרֵב (שיר השירים ה, יא).
Modern Candidate
Corvus spp. (raven and related corvids). The Torah itself presents a family group with למינו, so family-level identification is secure; species-level is not.
Common Raven (Corvus corax). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 7
בַּת הַיַּעֲנָה
bat ha-ya'anah
ostrich (trad.)
No lexical anchor
Verse
וְאֵת בַּת הַיַּעֲנָה וְאֶת־הַתַּחְמָס וְאֶת־הַשָּׁחַף וְאֶת־הַנֵּץ לְמִינֵהוּ׃
Leviticus 11:16 · Deuteronomy 14:15
Modern Candidate
Struthio camelus (common ostrich). Common modern candidate. No Rashi לעז, no verified verbatim Talmudic etymology, and no Rambam PM anchor in this dataset.
Common Ostrich (Struthio camelus). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 8
תַּחְמָס
tachmas
unresolved
No lexical anchor
Verse
וְאֶת־הַתַּחְמָס וְאֶת־הַשָּׁחַף
Leviticus 11:16 · Deuteronomy 14:15
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. No secure medieval lexical anchor in this dataset. The word appears nowhere else in Tanakh.
European Nightjar (Caprimulgus europaeus). One traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 9
שָׁחָף
shachaf
unresolved
No lexical anchor
Verse
וְאֶת־הַשָּׁחַף וְאֶת־הַנֵּץ לְמִינֵהוּ׃
Leviticus 11:16 · Deuteronomy 14:15
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. No secure medieval lexical anchor in this dataset.
Yellow-legged Gull (Larus michahellis). One traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 10
נֵץ
netz
hawk / sparrowhawk
Anchored (Rashi + Talmud)
Verse
וְאֶת־הַנֵּץ לְמִינֵהוּ׃
Leviticus 11:16 · Deuteronomy 14:15
Rashi on Leviticus 11:16
לעז:
אשפר״ויר
esprevier
— sparrowhawk / small hawk
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Abaye on netz sub-kind)
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הַנֵּץ — זֶה הַנֵּץ. לְמִינֵהוּ — לְהָבִיא אֶת בַּר חִירְיָא. מַאי בַּר חִירְיָא? אָמַר אַבַּיֵי: שׁוּרִינְקָא.
Modern Candidate
Accipiter sp.; likely Accipiter nisus (Eurasian sparrowhawk). Rashi's esprevier and the Talmudic sub-kind both point to the accipiter-class hawk zone; species-level identification is less secure.
Eurasian Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 11
כּוֹס
kos
owl (paired with yanshuf in Rashi)
Rashi-anchored (with caveat)
Verse
וְאֶת־הַכּוֹס וְאֶת־הַשָּׁלָךְ וְאֶת־הַיַּנְשׁוּף׃
Leviticus 11:17 · Deuteronomy 14:16
Rashi on Leviticus 11:17 (owl-pair)
לעז:
צואי״טש · יי״בו
chouette · hibou
— owl (pair)
Rashi gives two Old French owl-words (chouette, hibou) covering כוס and ינשוף together as an owl-pair. The internal one-to-one assignment — which French word belongs to which Hebrew word — is not made explicit in Rashi. This row should not be read as assigning chouette specifically to כוס.
Modern Candidate
Owl group (Strigidae/Tyto indeterminate). Rashi's לעז anchors the owl zone; internal species allocation between kos and yanshuf is not Rashi's own.
Little Owl (Athene noctua). One traditional candidate within the owl-pair, not a secure species identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 12
שָׁלָךְ
shalach
fish-catching bird (unresolved species)
Talmudic-anchored
Verse
וְאֶת־הַשָּׁלָךְ וְאֶת־הַיַּנְשׁוּף׃
Leviticus 11:17 · Deuteronomy 14:17
Rashi on Leviticus 11:17 (behavioral, no לעז)
זֶה הַשּׁוֹלֶה דָּגִים מִן הַיָּם.
Rashi gives a behavioral definition — "this is the one who draws fish from the sea" — not an Old French gloss. Behavior anchors ecology, not taxonomy.
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Yehuda, matching Rashi's phrasing)
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: שָׁלָךְ — זֶה הַשּׁוֹלֶה דָּגִים מִן הַיָּם.
Modern Candidate
Fish-snatching water bird, species unresolved. The medieval witnesses narrow ecology, not species.
Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo). One traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 13
יַנְשׁוּף
yanshuf
owl (paired with kos in Rashi)
Rashi-anchored (with caveat)
Verse
וְאֶת־הַיַּנְשׁוּף וְאֶת־הַתִּנְשֶׁמֶת
Leviticus 11:17–18 · Deuteronomy 14:16
Rashi on Leviticus 11:17 (owl-pair, shared with kos)
לעז:
צואי״טש · יי״בו
chouette · hibou
— owl (pair)
Same owl-pair as on the
kos row. Rashi's two Old French owl-words are not individually allocated — which French word belongs to
יַנְשׁוּף as distinct from
כּוֹס is not stated by Rashi himself.
Modern Candidate
Owl group, unresolved at species level.
Eurasian Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo). One traditional candidate within the owl-pair, not a secure species identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 14
תִּנְשֶׁמֶת
tinshemet
Rashi's לעז: bat (unresolved zoological problem)
Rashi-anchored (with caveat)
Verse
וְאֶת־הַתִּנְשֶׁמֶת וְהַקָּאָת וְהָרָחָם׃
Leviticus 11:18 · Deuteronomy 14:16
Rashi on Leviticus 11:18
לעז:
קלב״א שוריץ
calve soriz (chauve-souris)
— bat
Rashi's
לעז is a strong lexical datum but creates an unresolved zoological problem: it points to "bat," yet the Torah separately lists
עטלף as its own bird on the very next verse (Leviticus 11:19 —
see atalef below). The
לעז is therefore a lexical anchor, not a solved identification.
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. Rashi's reading and the Torah's separate listing of עטלף are in tension.
↑ Top
Row 15
קָאָת
ka'at
unresolved (Gemara: קוק, unidentified)
Talmudic-anchored
Verse
וְהַקָּאָת וְהָרָחָם
Leviticus 11:18 · Deuteronomy 14:17
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Yehuda)
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: קָאָת — זוֹ הַקּוּק.
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. The Gemara identifies קאת with an Aramaic term קוק which is itself not further identified in this passage.
Great White Pelican (Pelecanus onocrotalus). One traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 16
רָחָם
racham
Gemara: שרקרק (unidentified)
Talmudic-anchored
Verse
וְהָרָחָם וְהַחֲסִידָה
Leviticus 11:18 · Deuteronomy 14:17
Talmud · Chullin 63a (R. Yochanan on mercy etymology)
רָחָם — זוֹ שְׁרַקְרַק. אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: לָמָּה נִקְרָא שְׁמוֹ רָחָם? כֵּיוָן שֶׁבָּא רָחָם בָּאוּ רַחֲמִים לָעוֹלָם.
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Bibi bar Abaye on the messianic sign)
אָמַר רַב בִּיבִי בַּר אַבַּיֵי: וְהוּא דְיָתֵיב אַמִּידֵי וְעָבֵיד שְׁרַקְרַק. וּגְמִירִי דְּאִי יָתֵיב אַאַרְעָא וְשָׁרֵיק — אֲתָא מְשִׁיחָא, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: אֶשְׁרְקָה לָהֶם וַאֲקַבְּצֵם (זכריה י, ח).
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. Modern Hebrew uses רחם for Neophron percnopterus (Egyptian vulture) but this is a later identification; the Talmudic שרקרק is not itself securely identified.
Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus). Modern Hebrew usage of racham; not a secure identification of the Talmudic sherakrak. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 17
חֲסִידָה
chasidah
stork (via Rashi's לעז)
Anchored (Rashi + Talmud)
Verse
וְהַחֲסִידָה וְהָאֲנָפָה לְמִינָהּ
Leviticus 11:19 · Deuteronomy 14:18
Rashi on Leviticus 11:19
לעז:
ציגוני״א
cigogne
— stork
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Yehuda)
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: הַחֲסִידָה — זוֹ דַּיָּה לְבָנָה. לָמָּה נִקְרָא שְׁמָהּ חֲסִידָה? שֶׁעוֹשָׂה חֲסִידוּת עִם חַבְרוֹתֶיהָ.
Modern Candidate
Ciconia ciconia (white stork). Family-level "stork" is anchored by Rashi's cigogne; species-level white stork is the common Levantine candidate, though species precision still requires caution.
White Stork (Ciconia ciconia). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 18
אֲנָפָה
anafah
heron (via Rashi's לעז)
Anchored (Rashi + Talmud)
Verse
וְהָאֲנָפָה לְמִינָהּ וְהַדּוּכִיפַת וְהָעֲטַלֵּף׃
Leviticus 11:19 · Deuteronomy 14:18
Rashi on Leviticus 11:19
לעז:
הירו״ן
heron
— heron
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Yehuda)
הָאֲנָפָה — זוֹ דַּיָּה רַגְזָנִית. לָמָּה נִקְרָא שְׁמָהּ אֲנָפָה? שֶׁמְּנָאֶפֶת עִם חַבְרוֹתֶיהָ.
Modern Candidate
Ardea sp.; probably Ardea cinerea (grey heron). Rashi's heron anchors the family; species-level is slightly less secure.
Grey Heron (Ardea cinerea). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 19
דּוּכִיפַת
duchifat
hoopoe
Anchored (Rashi + Talmud)
Verse
וְהַדּוּכִיפַת וְהָעֲטַלֵּף
Leviticus 11:19 · Deuteronomy 14:18
Rashi on Leviticus 11:19
לעז:
הרופ״א
huppe (likely)
— hoopoe
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Yehuda)
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: דּוּכִיפַת — שֶׁהוֹדוֹ כָּפוּת. תַּנְיָא נַמֵי הָכִי: דּוּכִיפַת שֶׁהוֹדוֹ כָּפוּת, וְזֶהוּ שֶׁהֵבִיא שָׁמִיר לְבֵית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ.
Modern Candidate
Upupa epops (hoopoe). Rashi's huppe and the Talmudic "glory-bound" (crest) etymology both point to a crested bird; this is the most widely accepted identification on the list.
Hoopoe (Upupa epops). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Row 20
עֲטַלֵּף
atalef
bat
No lexical anchor
Verse
וְאֶת־הָעֲטַלֵּף׃
Leviticus 11:19 · Deuteronomy 14:18
Modern Candidate
Bat (at the lemma level). No Rashi
לעז on
עטלף itself — Rashi's bat-word appears on
tinshemet (Row 14) and the conflict between the two listings is noted there. No verified Talmudic etymology for
עטלף in this dataset.
Egyptian Fruit Bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) at Hai-Bar Yotvata, Israel. One example of the bat group, not a secure species identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.
↑ Top
Family-Expansion Rows (4)
The Torah's four למינה / למינו / למינהו clauses attach to איה · עורב · נץ · אנפה. This document renders them as structural rows so the presentation matches the Talmudic count of 24 in Chullin 61b. The Gemara's own derivation of the count is more involved than a one-to-one clause-to-row mapping.
Row 21 · family
לְמִינָהּ
on ayah/dayah
Lev 11:14 · Deut 14:13
No lexical anchor (family row)
Row 22 · family
לְמִינוֹ
on orev
Lev 11:15 · Deut 14:14
Talmudic-anchored
Talmud · Chullin 63a (raven sub-kinds)
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: עוֹרֵב — זֶה עוֹרֵב. אֶת־כׇּל־עוֹרֵב — לְהָבִיא עוֹרֵב הָעֶמֶקִי. לְמִינוֹ — לְהָבִיא עוֹרֵב הַבָּא בְּרָאשֵׁי יוֹנִים.
Row 23 · family
לְמִינֵהוּ
on netz
Lev 11:16 · Deut 14:15
No lexical anchor (family row)
See
netz headword row (10) for Rashi's
esprevier and the Chullin 63a
bar chiriya passage. This row is the structural family-expansion.
Row 24 · family
לְמִינָהּ
on anafah
Lev 11:19 · Deut 14:18
No lexical anchor (family row)
Confidence Distribution Across 24 Rows
Anchored (Rashi + Talmud) — 4 rows: netz, chasidah, anafah, duchifat.
Rashi-anchored with caveat — 3 rows: kos, yanshuf, tinshemet.
Talmudic-anchored — 8 rows: nesher, da'ah/ra'ah, ayah/dayah, orev, ka'at, racham, shalach, and the orev family-expansion row.
Structural anchor only — 2 rows: peres, ozniyah. Named in the Chullin 61b sugya on the structural count of 24 birds and 4 signs, but no lexical identification anchor (no Rashi לעז, no etymology).
No lexical anchor — 7 rows: bat ha-ya'anah, tachmas, shachaf, atalef, plus the ayah/dayah, netz, and anafah family-expansion rows.
Total: 4 + 3 + 8 + 2 + 7 = 24.
⚠ Scope of This Section
These observations describe anatomical patterns within each group. They are not halakhic determinations — the operative rules appear in Part A (the Four Signs and the role of mesorah), and the verified per-bird analysis appears in Part B. No bird is declared kosher or non-kosher in this section.
The birds listed in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14 cluster into ecological groupings that modern observers also recognize — raptors, owls, long-legged waders, corvids, one ground-dwelling bird, one crested insect-eater, and one flying mammal grouped in the Torah's bird list. For readers working through Part B specimen-by-specimen, this section offers a different entry point: the same 20 head-terms reorganized by ecological group.
Within each group, certain anatomical patterns appear consistently. The Four Signs defined in Part A — dores, etzba yeseira, zefek, kurkevan niklaf — can be observed across whole groups, not only in individual birds. That is part of why the Sages' signs were derivable from the Torah's list: birds grouped by lifestyle often display similar observable traits.
Order 1
Raptors — hawks, eagles, vultures
Accipitriformes (plus Falconiformes for falcons)
Raptors hunt or scavenge with hooked beaks and powerful taloned feet. Some, like the griffon vulture, feed primarily on carrion; others, like the sparrowhawk, take live prey in flight. Most soar on thermal updrafts or wait motionless before striking. All share the hunting-specific anatomy: hooked beak, strong feet with curved claws, forward-facing eyes for depth perception.
Birds from Part B in this order
דּוֹרֵס · dores
commonly observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
not relied on in this guide
זֶפֶק · zefek
varies across the group
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
not relied on in this guide
Caveats
- Pure scavengers (nesher / griffon vulture, racham / Egyptian vulture) do not hunt live prey in the strict sense; whether they meet Rashi's or Rabbeinu Tam's definition of dores is a substantive question, treated in Part A.
- Chullin 61b notes that peres and ozniyah each possess one of the four signs, unlike the other listed birds; see Part B for the verbatim passage.
- The da'ah/ra'ah and ayah/dayah rows are identified by Chullin 63b as one species each; see Part B rows 4 and 5 for the verbatim Talmudic text.
↑ Top
Order 2
Owls
Strigiformes
Owls are nocturnal hunters. Their eyes are forward-facing and exceptionally large for their skull size; asymmetrical ear openings allow them to locate prey by sound alone in total darkness; specialized wing feathers dampen airflow noise in flight. They hunt small mammals, other birds, and insects, swallowing prey whole and later regurgitating indigestible bone and fur as pellets.
Birds from Part B in this order
דּוֹרֵס · dores
commonly observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
absent
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
absent
Caveats
- Rashi groups kos and yanshuf together as an owl-pair in his Old French gloss (chouette / hibou) without specifying internal allocation — see Part B rows 11 and 13.
- Tinshemet is placed in this section tentatively on the strength of one traditional identification (barn owl); Rashi's own לעז on tinshemet is the bat-word calve soriz, which creates an unresolved tension noted in Part B row 14.
↑ Top
Order 3
Storks and herons — long-legged waders
Ciconiiformes (storks) and Pelecaniformes (herons)
Long-legged waders feed in shallow water, spearing or seizing fish, frogs, small reptiles, and small mammals with dagger-like bills. Storks and herons share the long-legs / long-neck / long-bill body plan but differ in hunting style: herons stand motionless and strike; storks walk and grab more actively.
Birds from Part B in this order
דּוֹרֵס · dores
predatory feeding observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
absent
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
absent
Caveats
- These are the only two Part B specimens anchored at Anchored (Rashi + Talmud) confidence via a Rashi Old French gloss (cigogne for chasidah, heron for anafah) plus verbatim Chullin 63a passages.
- The shalach (Part B row 12) is traditionally placed among fish-catching birds but identified by Rashi and Rav Yehuda behaviorally, not zoologically. It is not placed in this order because its species is genuinely unresolved.
- Whether the herons' and storks' spear-and-strike feeding maps to dores under any given Rishon's definition is exactly the question Part A presents — this row does not pre-judge it.
↑ Top
Order 4
Ravens, crows, and related corvids
Corvidae (within Passeriformes)
Corvids are omnivorous — they eat seeds, fruit, insects, carrion, and small prey. They are not strict predators; they do not pursue live prey the way a hawk does, and they do not have the hooked beak or curved talons of the Accipitriformes. They are the one songbird family (Passeriformes) in the Torah's list.
Birds from Part B in this order
דּוֹרֵס · dores
variably observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
present
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
absent
Caveats
- Corvids possess a hind toe (hallux) that is visibly set apart from the three front toes, which matches one reading of etzba yeseira — but as Part A notes, no verbatim Rashi definition of etzba yeseira was located, so whether corvid foot anatomy satisfies the sign halakhically is not a question this guide answers.
- Corvid scavenging on carrion is well-observed; whether this counts as dores depends on which definition applies — see Part A Section II (Rashi and Tosafot verbatim).
- The l'mino expansion is given its own row in Part B per the Talmud's derivation at Chullin 63a (sub-kinds: valley raven, raven-with-dove-like-heads).
↑ Top
Order 5
Hoopoe
Upupiformes (sometimes Bucerotiformes)
The hoopoe is a ground-probing insectivore. It walks on short legs, uses its long curved bill to extract insects, grubs, and small reptiles from soil and crevices, and displays a fan-shaped erectable crest. It is the only species in its order found in the Levant.
Birds from Part B in this order
דּוֹרֵס · dores
not observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
present
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
absent
Caveats
- Duchifat is one of the four Anchored (Rashi + Talmud) rows in Part B. Rashi's לעז (huppe, likely) and the Talmudic הודו כפות ("its glory is bound," i.e. the crest) converge cleanly on this species.
- It is also one of the few Torah birds that is not in any sense a predator. Its inclusion in the Torah's forbidden list is explicit; this guide does not infer a practical ruling from the signs.
↑ Top
Order 6
Ostrich
Struthioniformes (ratites)
Ratites are large flightless birds with reduced wing structures and powerful legs. The ostrich is the largest living bird. It is a ground-running omnivore, feeding on seeds, plants, and occasional small animals.
Birds from Part B in this order
דּוֹרֵס · dores
not observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
absent
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
present
Caveats
- This is the classic case of signs vs. explicit prohibition. The ostrich has a peelable gizzard — a positive sign — yet the Torah names it explicitly as forbidden. Part A Section III ("Why Mesorah Decides") discusses how the halakhic system treats signs as necessary but not sufficient; bat ha-ya'anah is the most cited example.
- Other ratites (emu, rhea, cassowary) were not known in the biblical Levant. Whether they are included in the Torah's prohibition is a halakhic question not addressed in this guide.
↑ Top
Order 7
Bats
Chiroptera (mammal order, not bird)
Bats are the only mammals capable of true powered flight. Most species in the Levant feed on insects caught in flight; the Egyptian fruit bat (common in Israel) feeds on dates, figs, and other fruit. They roost in caves, hollow trees, or abandoned structures and are active at dusk and night.
The Torah lists atalef among the flying creatures in this passage. This guide follows the verse's placement without making a zoological claim from it.
Birds from Part B in this order
Note on the Four Signs for this group
The Four Signs were stated by the Sages for birds. Bats do not possess avian anatomy, and the signs do not apply in the structural way they do for the other orders in this section. The atalef is forbidden by the Torah's explicit listing (Leviticus 11:19), which does not depend on the signs.
Caveats
- Rashi's לעז for tinshemet (Part B row 14) is calve soriz = bat. This creates a structural question the document does not resolve: if tinshemet is a bat, what is atalef? The question is flagged in Part B and not re-argued here.
↑ Top
Closing
Across seven groupings, the Torah's forbidden birds cluster into lifestyles. Predators (Accipitriformes, Strigiformes, Ciconiiformes) share the absence of the positive signs and commonly display predatory feeding. Scavengers and omnivores (Corvidae, part of the vulture group) fall between. The ground-runners and crested insect-eaters (Struthioniformes, Upupiformes) have their own patterns. The atalef stands alone in the Torah's grouping on the strength of flight.
The Four Signs can be viewed alongside these ecological groupings, but this section does not derive halakhic conclusions from that comparison. The operative rules are in Part A, and the verified per-bird analysis is in Part B.