A Three-Part Study

The Framework

The Torah's forbidden birds, the Sages' four signs, and the role of mesorah — the conceptual scaffolding beneath the specimen-by-specimen analysis in Part B.

Every primary-source quote in this guide is reproduced verbatim with a direct Sefaria link. No views are attributed to Rishonim unless the exact text is present. Where a gloss could not be verbatim-located, the section says so plainly.

Section I

The Torah's Forbidden Birds

The list appears twice — in Leviticus 11:13–19 and Deuteronomy 14:12–18.

Unlike mammals and fish, the Torah does not give signs for kosher birds. Instead, it names the birds that are forbidden; the Sages then formulate signs for identifying permitted birds.

The list follows. Each name links to its specimen row in Part B, where verse text, verified commentary, and modern candidates are laid out in detail. Identifications vary in confidence — that variation, documented in Part B, is the reason the Sages introduced signs and mesorah.

Torah · Leviticus 11:13–19 (verbatim)
וְאֶת־אֵלֶּה תְּשַׁקְּצוּ מִן־הָעוֹף לֹא יֵאָכְלוּ שֶׁקֶץ הֵם: אֶת־הַנֶּשֶׁר וְאֶת־הַפֶּרֶס וְאֵת הָעׇזְנִיָּה׃ וְאֶת־הַדָּאָה וְאֶת־הָאַיָּה לְמִינָהּ׃ אֵת כׇּל־עֹרֵב לְמִינוֹ׃ וְאֵת בַּת הַיַּעֲנָה וְאֶת־הַתַּחְמָס וְאֶת־הַשָּׁחַף וְאֶת־הַנֵּץ לְמִינֵהוּ׃ וְאֶת־הַכּוֹס וְאֶת־הַשָּׁלָךְ וְאֶת־הַיַּנְשׁוּף׃ וְאֶת־הַתִּנְשֶׁמֶת וְהַקָּאָת וְהָרָחָם׃ וְהַחֲסִידָה הָאֲנָפָה לְמִינָהּ וְהַדּוּכִיפַת וְהָעֲטַלֵּף׃

The Twenty Head-Terms

1נֶשֶׁרneshergriffon vulture / eagle
2פֶּרֶסperesbearded vulture / lammergeier
3עׇזְנִיָּהozniyahsea eagle / black vulture
4דָּאָה / רָאָהda'ah / ra'ahone species per Chullin 63b
5אַיָּה / דַּיָּהayah / dayahone species per Chullin 63b
6עֹרֵבorevraven (base term)
7בַּת הַיַּעֲנָהbat ha-ya'anahostrich (trad.)
8תַּחְמָסtachmasunresolved
9שָׁחָףshachafunresolved
10נֵץnetzhawk / sparrowhawk
11כּוֹסkosowl (Rashi owl-pair)
12שָׁלָךְshalachfish-catching bird (unresolved)
13יַנְשׁוּףyanshufowl (Rashi owl-pair)
14תִּנְשֶׁמֶתtinshemetRashi's לעז: bat (unresolved)
15קָאָתka'atGemara: קוק (unidentified)
16רָחָםrachamGemara: שרקרק (unidentified)
17חֲסִידָהchasidahstork (via Rashi's לעז)
18אֲנָפָהanafahheron (via Rashi's לעז)
19דּוּכִיפַתduchifathoopoe
20עֲטַלֵּףatalefbat

The Torah also uses four למינה / למינו / למינהו family-expansion clauses on da'ah/ra'ah, orev, netz, and anafah. This guide renders those clauses as family-expansion rows so the presentation matches the Talmudic count of 24. See Part B's family-expansion rows.

↑ Top
Section II

The Four Signs

The Sages' working rules for identifying kosher birds, derived from the forbidden list itself.

Since the Torah gave no positive signs for kosher birds, the Sages in Mishnah Chullin 3:6 stated four working rules — one negative (dores, "seizes prey") and three positive (etzba yeseira, zefek, kurkevan niklaf). The Mishnah is reproduced below verbatim.

Of the four, dores is the one whose definition is most debated. Rashi on Chullin 59a and Tosafot on Chullin 61a take different positions, both reproduced below verbatim from Sefaria. The other three signs are named in the Mishnah itself; no verbatim Rashi definitions were located for reproduction here.

Mishnah · Chullin 3:6 (verbatim)
Mishnah (folio 59a)
סִימָנֵי בְּהֵמָה וְחַיָּה נֶאֶמְרוּ מִן הַתּוֹרָה, וְסִימָנֵי הָעוֹף לֹא נֶאֶמְרוּ. אֲבָל אָמְרוּ חֲכָמִים: כָּל עוֹף הַדּוֹרֵס — טָמֵא. כֹּל שֶׁיֶּשׁ לוֹ אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה, וְזֶפֶק, וְקֻרְקְבָנוֹ נִקְלָף — טָהוֹר. רַבִּי אֱלִיעֶזֶר בַּר צָדוֹק אוֹמֵר: כָּל עוֹף הַחוֹלֵק אֶת רַגְלָיו — טָמֵא.
Sign I דּוֹרֵס dores — "seizes prey" (the negative sign)
Rashi on Chullin 59a (verbatim)
Rashi
שֶׁאוֹחֵז בְּצִפּוֹרְנָיו וּמַגְבִּיהַּ מִן הַקַּרְקַע מַה שֶּׁאוֹכֵל.
This Rashi text is independently preserved in Tosafot on Chullin 61a (below), which quotes Rashi by name using the exact same wording.
Tosafot on Chullin 61a (verbatim — citing Rabbeinu Tam)
Tosafot, citing Rabbeinu Tam
הַדּוֹרֵס — פֵּירֵשׁ בַּקּוּנְטְרֵס שֶׁאוֹחֵז בְּצִפּוֹרְנָיו וּמַגְבִּיהַּ מִן הַקַּרְקַע מַה שֶׁאוֹכֵל, וְקָשֶׁה לְרַבֵּינוּ תָּם דְּהָא אֲפִילּוּ תַּרְנְגוֹלֶת עוֹשָׂה כֵן, וּמְפָרֵשׁ רַבֵּינוּ תָּם — דּוֹרֵס וְאוֹכֵל מֵחַיִּים וְאֵינוֹ מַמְתִּין לָהּ עַד שֶׁתָּמוּת.
Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam (as Tosafot reports him) differ on what dores describes. The two quotes stand side by side; a reader can compare them directly.
Sign II אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה etzba yeseira — "extra toe"
The Mishnah names etzba yeseira but does not elaborate on which toe is meant. Later authorities discuss this; no verbatim Rashi definition was located for reproduction here. See the Further Study note at the end of this section.
Sign III זֶפֶק zefek — "crop"
A pouch in the esophagus where food is softened before digestion. The Mishnah names the feature; no verbatim Rashi definition was located for reproduction here.
Sign IV קֻרְקְבָנוֹ נִקְלָף kurkevan niklaf — "gizzard that can be peeled"
The muscular stomach has an inner lining. In kosher birds the lining peels away by hand. The Mishnah names this; no verbatim Rashi definition was located for reproduction here.
↑ Top
Section III

Why Mesorah Decides

Later halakhic practice treats signs as necessary but not sufficient.

The four signs provide the Mishnah's framework for identifying permitted birds, but this guide does not present them as a standalone practical ruling system.

Later halakhic practice treats mesorah as decisive in many bird-identification cases. This guide does not reproduce the decisor texts here; see Further Study.

This is why the identification debates in Part B are presented as source-critical and zoological, not as practical kashrut rulings.

New bird species encountered in new regions are outside the scope of this guide's practical conclusions. For applied halakhah, consult the decisor texts listed below.

↑ Top
Section IV

Further Study

This guide's sources policy is strict: every popup reproduces verbatim text with a Sefaria link, and paraphrases are not attributed to the Gemara or to specific Rishonim. That discipline means some views that appear in traditional Jewish educational materials are not reproduced here.

Readers who want the full picture should consult the following primary materials directly on Sefaria.

↑ Top
End of Part A
Part B · The Specimens
A Three-Part Study

The Specimens

The Torah's list of forbidden birds, organized as twenty head-terms plus four family-expansion clauses (למינה / למינו / למינהו) — 24 rows total, matching the Talmudic count of 24 forbidden birds.

The Torah names twenty distinct birds — or twenty-one, if ראה/דאה and איה/דיה are counted as separate lexical entries. The Talmud reaches twenty-four; this document renders the four למינה/למינו/למינהו clauses as structural rows to match that count. The Gemara's own derivation of the count is more complex than a one-to-one clause-to-row mapping.

Row 1 נֶשֶׁר nesher griffon vulture (mod.) / eagle (trad.) Talmudic-anchored
Verse
אֶת־הַנֶּשֶׁר וְאֶת־הַפֶּרֶס וְאֵת הָעׇזְנִיָּה׃
Leviticus 11:13 · Deuteronomy 14:12
Talmud · Chullin 61b (24 birds, 4 signs)
גְּמִירִי עֶשְׂרִים וְאַרְבָּעָה עוֹפוֹת טְמֵאִים הָווּ וְאַרְבָּעָה סִימָנִין. תְּלָתָא הָדְרִי בְּכֻלְּהוּ עֶשְׂרִים מֵהֶם שְׁלֹשָׁה שְׁלֹשָׁה, וּתְרֵי בְּעוֹרֵב, חַד בְּפֶרֶס וְחַד בְּעׇזְנִיָּה.
This passage establishes the structural count (24 birds, 4 signs) and groups נשר · פרס · עזניה. It is rendered once here and cross-referenced from the peres and ozniyah rows.
Modern Candidate
Gyps fulvus (Eurasian griffon vulture). Common modern candidate; no medieval לעז or Rambam PM anchor in this dataset.
Eurasian griffon vulture (Gyps fulvus) in flight, showing broad wings and bare head

Eurasian Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 2 פֶּרֶס peres bearded vulture / lammergeier Structural anchor only
Verse
אֶת־הַנֶּשֶׁר וְאֶת־הַפֶּרֶס וְאֵת הָעׇזְנִיָּה׃
Leviticus 11:13 · Deuteronomy 14:12
Chullin 61b names פרס as one of the two birds having exactly one of the four signs. See the verbatim 61b quote on the nesher row above.
Modern Candidate
Gypaetus barbatus (bearded vulture / lammergeier). Common modern candidate; no Rashi לעז and no Rambam PM anchor in this dataset.
Bearded vulture / lammergeier (Gypaetus barbatus), front view showing distinctive facial feathers

Bearded Vulture / Lammergeier (Gypaetus barbatus). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 3 עׇזְנִיָּה ozniyah sea eagle (trad.) / black vulture (mod.) Structural anchor only
Verse
אֶת־הַנֶּשֶׁר וְאֶת־הַפֶּרֶס וְאֵת הָעׇזְנִיָּה׃
Leviticus 11:13 · Deuteronomy 14:12
Chullin 61b names עזניה as the other bird with exactly one of the four signs. See the verbatim 61b quote on the nesher row above.
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. Aegypius monachus (cinereous vulture) is the common modern candidate but carries no medieval לעז or Rambam PM anchor in this dataset.
Cinereous vulture (Aegypius monachus) in flight — traditional candidate for ozniyah, not a secure identification

Cinereous Vulture (Aegypius monachus). Traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 4 דָּאָה / רָאָה da'ah / ra'ah one species per Chullin 63b Talmudic-anchored
Verses
וְאֶת־הַדָּאָה וְאֶת־הָאַיָּה לְמִינָהּ׃ (ויקרא)
וְהָרָאָה וְאֶת־הָאַיָּה וְהַדַּיָּה לְמִינָהּ׃ (דברים)
Leviticus 11:14 · Deuteronomy 14:13
Talmud · Chullin 63b (one-species derivation)
מִכְדִּי מִשְׁנֵה תּוֹרָה לְאוֹסוֹפֵי הוּא דְּאָתָא, מַאי שְׁנָא הָכָא דִּכְתִיב דָּאָה וּמַאי שְׁנָא הָכָא דִּכְתִיב רָאָה וְלָא כְתִיב דָּאָה? אֶלָּא שְׁמַע מִינַּהּ — מִין רָאָה וְדָאָה אַחַת הִיא.
Modern Candidate
Unresolved raptor complex. No Rashi לעז for this row.
Black kite (Milvus migrans) in flight — traditional candidate for the da'ah/ra'ah complex, not a secure identification

Black Kite (Milvus migrans). Traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 5 אַיָּה / דַּיָּה ayah / dayah one species per Chullin 63b Talmudic-anchored
Verses
Leviticus 11:14 (איה) · Deuteronomy 14:13 (איה · דיה)
Talmud · Chullin 63b (Abaye on parallel identification)
אָמַר אַבַּיֵי: כְּשֵׁם שֶׁרָאָה וְדָאָה אַחַת הִיא, כָּךְ אַיָּה וְדַיָּה אַחַת הִיא.
Talmud · Chullin 63b (Rabbi on the multiple names)
כִּדְתַנְיָא: רַבִּי אוֹמֵר: אֶקְרָא אֲנִי אַיָּה, דַּיָּה לָמָּה נֶאֶמְרָה? כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא תִּתֵּן פִּתְחוֹן פֶּה לְבַעַל דִּין לַחֲלֹק — שֶׁלֹּא תְּהֵא אַתָּה קוֹרֵא אַיָּה וְהוּא קוֹרֵא דַּיָּה.
Modern Candidate
Unresolved raptor complex. No Rashi לעז.
Peregrine falcon in flight — traditional raptor candidate, not a secure identification for the ayah/dayah complex

Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus). Traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 6 עֹרֵב orev raven (base term) Talmudic-anchored
Verse
אֵת כׇּל־עֹרֵב לְמִינוֹ׃
Leviticus 11:15 · Deuteronomy 14:14
Talmud · Chullin 63a ("black as a raven")
אָמַר מָר: עוֹרֵב זֶה עוֹרֵב. אַטּוּ קַמַּן קָאֵי? אֶלָּא אֵימָא עוֹרֵב זֶה עוֹרֵב אוּכְמָא. וְכֵן הוּא אוֹמֵר: קְוֻצּוֹתָיו תַּלְתַּלִּים שְׁחֹרוֹת כָּעוֹרֵב (שיר השירים ה, יא).
The sub-kinds expansion (למינו) is on the orev family row below.
Modern Candidate
Corvus spp. (raven and related corvids). The Torah itself presents a family group with למינו, so family-level identification is secure; species-level is not.
Common raven (Corvus corax) showing black plumage referenced in Song of Songs 5:11

Common Raven (Corvus corax). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 7 בַּת הַיַּעֲנָה bat ha-ya'anah ostrich (trad.) No lexical anchor
Verse
וְאֵת בַּת הַיַּעֲנָה וְאֶת־הַתַּחְמָס וְאֶת־הַשָּׁחַף וְאֶת־הַנֵּץ לְמִינֵהוּ׃
Leviticus 11:16 · Deuteronomy 14:15
Modern Candidate
Struthio camelus (common ostrich). Common modern candidate. No Rashi לעז, no verified verbatim Talmudic etymology, and no Rambam PM anchor in this dataset.
Common ostrich (Struthio camelus) — flightless ratite with a peelable gizzard despite being explicitly forbidden

Common Ostrich (Struthio camelus). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 8 תַּחְמָס tachmas unresolved No lexical anchor
Verse
וְאֶת־הַתַּחְמָס וְאֶת־הַשָּׁחַף
Leviticus 11:16 · Deuteronomy 14:15
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. No secure medieval lexical anchor in this dataset. The word appears nowhere else in Tanakh.
European nightjar (Caprimulgus europaeus) — one traditional candidate for tachmas, not a secure identification

European Nightjar (Caprimulgus europaeus). One traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 9 שָׁחָף shachaf unresolved No lexical anchor
Verse
וְאֶת־הַשָּׁחַף וְאֶת־הַנֵּץ לְמִינֵהוּ׃
Leviticus 11:16 · Deuteronomy 14:15
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. No secure medieval lexical anchor in this dataset.
Yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) — one traditional candidate for shachaf, not a secure identification

Yellow-legged Gull (Larus michahellis). One traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 10 נֵץ netz hawk / sparrowhawk Anchored (Rashi + Talmud)
Verse
וְאֶת־הַנֵּץ לְמִינֵהוּ׃
Leviticus 11:16 · Deuteronomy 14:15
Rashi on Leviticus 11:16
לעז: אשפר״ויר esprevier — sparrowhawk / small hawk
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Abaye on netz sub-kind)
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: הַנֵּץ — זֶה הַנֵּץ. לְמִינֵהוּ — לְהָבִיא אֶת בַּר חִירְיָא. מַאי בַּר חִירְיָא? אָמַר אַבַּיֵי: שׁוּרִינְקָא.
Modern Candidate
Accipiter sp.; likely Accipiter nisus (Eurasian sparrowhawk). Rashi's esprevier and the Talmudic sub-kind both point to the accipiter-class hawk zone; species-level identification is less secure.
Eurasian sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) — matches Rashi's Old French esprevier

Eurasian Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 11 כּוֹס kos owl (paired with yanshuf in Rashi) Rashi-anchored (with caveat)
Verse
וְאֶת־הַכּוֹס וְאֶת־הַשָּׁלָךְ וְאֶת־הַיַּנְשׁוּף׃
Leviticus 11:17 · Deuteronomy 14:16
Rashi on Leviticus 11:17 (owl-pair)
לעז: צואי״טש · יי״בו chouette · hibou — owl (pair)
Rashi gives two Old French owl-words (chouette, hibou) covering כוס and ינשוף together as an owl-pair. The internal one-to-one assignment — which French word belongs to which Hebrew word — is not made explicit in Rashi. This row should not be read as assigning chouette specifically to כוס.
Modern Candidate
Owl group (Strigidae/Tyto indeterminate). Rashi's לעז anchors the owl zone; internal species allocation between kos and yanshuf is not Rashi's own.
Little owl (Athene noctua) — one traditional candidate within the owl group named by Rashi's owl-pair gloss

Little Owl (Athene noctua). One traditional candidate within the owl-pair, not a secure species identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 12 שָׁלָךְ shalach fish-catching bird (unresolved species) Talmudic-anchored
Verse
וְאֶת־הַשָּׁלָךְ וְאֶת־הַיַּנְשׁוּף׃
Leviticus 11:17 · Deuteronomy 14:17
Rashi on Leviticus 11:17 (behavioral, no לעז)
זֶה הַשּׁוֹלֶה דָּגִים מִן הַיָּם.
Rashi gives a behavioral definition — "this is the one who draws fish from the sea" — not an Old French gloss. Behavior anchors ecology, not taxonomy.
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Yehuda, matching Rashi's phrasing)
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: שָׁלָךְ — זֶה הַשּׁוֹלֶה דָּגִים מִן הַיָּם.
Modern Candidate
Fish-snatching water bird, species unresolved. The medieval witnesses narrow ecology, not species.
Great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) — one traditional candidate for a fish-drawing bird, not a secure identification

Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo). One traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 13 יַנְשׁוּף yanshuf owl (paired with kos in Rashi) Rashi-anchored (with caveat)
Verse
וְאֶת־הַיַּנְשׁוּף וְאֶת־הַתִּנְשֶׁמֶת
Leviticus 11:17–18 · Deuteronomy 14:16
Rashi on Leviticus 11:17 (owl-pair, shared with kos)
לעז: צואי״טש · יי״בו chouette · hibou — owl (pair)
Same owl-pair as on the kos row. Rashi's two Old French owl-words are not individually allocated — which French word belongs to יַנְשׁוּף as distinct from כּוֹס is not stated by Rashi himself.
Modern Candidate
Owl group, unresolved at species level.
Eurasian eagle owl (Bubo bubo) — one traditional candidate within the owl group, not a secure identification

Eurasian Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo). One traditional candidate within the owl-pair, not a secure species identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 14 תִּנְשֶׁמֶת tinshemet Rashi's לעז: bat (unresolved zoological problem) Rashi-anchored (with caveat)
Verse
וְאֶת־הַתִּנְשֶׁמֶת וְהַקָּאָת וְהָרָחָם׃
Leviticus 11:18 · Deuteronomy 14:16
Rashi on Leviticus 11:18
לעז: קלב״א שוריץ calve soriz (chauve-souris) — bat
Rashi's לעז is a strong lexical datum but creates an unresolved zoological problem: it points to "bat," yet the Torah separately lists עטלף as its own bird on the very next verse (Leviticus 11:19 — see atalef below). The לעז is therefore a lexical anchor, not a solved identification.
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. Rashi's reading and the Torah's separate listing of עטלף are in tension.
↑ Top
Row 15 קָאָת ka'at unresolved (Gemara: קוק, unidentified) Talmudic-anchored
Verse
וְהַקָּאָת וְהָרָחָם
Leviticus 11:18 · Deuteronomy 14:17
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Yehuda)
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: קָאָת — זוֹ הַקּוּק.
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. The Gemara identifies קאת with an Aramaic term קוק which is itself not further identified in this passage.
Great white pelican (Pelecanus onocrotalus) — one traditional candidate for ka'at, not a secure identification

Great White Pelican (Pelecanus onocrotalus). One traditional candidate, not a secure identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 16 רָחָם racham Gemara: שרקרק (unidentified) Talmudic-anchored
Verse
וְהָרָחָם וְהַחֲסִידָה
Leviticus 11:18 · Deuteronomy 14:17
Talmud · Chullin 63a (R. Yochanan on mercy etymology)
רָחָם — זוֹ שְׁרַקְרַק. אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן: לָמָּה נִקְרָא שְׁמוֹ רָחָם? כֵּיוָן שֶׁבָּא רָחָם בָּאוּ רַחֲמִים לָעוֹלָם.
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Bibi bar Abaye on the messianic sign)
אָמַר רַב בִּיבִי בַּר אַבַּיֵי: וְהוּא דְיָתֵיב אַמִּידֵי וְעָבֵיד שְׁרַקְרַק. וּגְמִירִי דְּאִי יָתֵיב אַאַרְעָא וְשָׁרֵיק — אֲתָא מְשִׁיחָא, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר: אֶשְׁרְקָה לָהֶם וַאֲקַבְּצֵם (זכריה י, ח).
Modern Candidate
Unresolved. Modern Hebrew uses רחם for Neophron percnopterus (Egyptian vulture) but this is a later identification; the Talmudic שרקרק is not itself securely identified.
Egyptian vulture (Neophron percnopterus) — modern Hebrew referent of racham, not the Talmudic sherakrak

Egyptian Vulture (Neophron percnopterus). Modern Hebrew usage of racham; not a secure identification of the Talmudic sherakrak. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 17 חֲסִידָה chasidah stork (via Rashi's לעז) Anchored (Rashi + Talmud)
Verse
וְהַחֲסִידָה וְהָאֲנָפָה לְמִינָהּ
Leviticus 11:19 · Deuteronomy 14:18
Rashi on Leviticus 11:19
לעז: ציגוני״א cigogne — stork
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Yehuda)
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: הַחֲסִידָה — זוֹ דַּיָּה לְבָנָה. לָמָּה נִקְרָא שְׁמָהּ חֲסִידָה? שֶׁעוֹשָׂה חֲסִידוּת עִם חַבְרוֹתֶיהָ.
Modern Candidate
Ciconia ciconia (white stork). Family-level "stork" is anchored by Rashi's cigogne; species-level white stork is the common Levantine candidate, though species precision still requires caution.
White stork (Ciconia ciconia) — matches Rashi's Old French cigogne

White Stork (Ciconia ciconia). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 18 אֲנָפָה anafah heron (via Rashi's לעז) Anchored (Rashi + Talmud)
Verse
וְהָאֲנָפָה לְמִינָהּ וְהַדּוּכִיפַת וְהָעֲטַלֵּף׃
Leviticus 11:19 · Deuteronomy 14:18
Rashi on Leviticus 11:19
לעז: הירו״ן heron — heron
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Yehuda)
הָאֲנָפָה — זוֹ דַּיָּה רַגְזָנִית. לָמָּה נִקְרָא שְׁמָהּ אֲנָפָה? שֶׁמְּנָאֶפֶת עִם חַבְרוֹתֶיהָ.
Modern Candidate
Ardea sp.; probably Ardea cinerea (grey heron). Rashi's heron anchors the family; species-level is slightly less secure.
Grey heron (Ardea cinerea) in flight — matches Rashi's Old French heron

Grey Heron (Ardea cinerea). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 19 דּוּכִיפַת duchifat hoopoe Anchored (Rashi + Talmud)
Verse
וְהַדּוּכִיפַת וְהָעֲטַלֵּף
Leviticus 11:19 · Deuteronomy 14:18
Rashi on Leviticus 11:19
לעז: הרופ״א huppe (likely) — hoopoe
Talmud · Chullin 63a (Rav Yehuda)
אָמַר רַב יְהוּדָה: דּוּכִיפַת — שֶׁהוֹדוֹ כָּפוּת. תַּנְיָא נַמֵי הָכִי: דּוּכִיפַת שֶׁהוֹדוֹ כָּפוּת, וְזֶהוּ שֶׁהֵבִיא שָׁמִיר לְבֵית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ.
Modern Candidate
Upupa epops (hoopoe). Rashi's huppe and the Talmudic "glory-bound" (crest) etymology both point to a crested bird; this is the most widely accepted identification on the list.
Hoopoe (Upupa epops) with distinctive erectable crest — matches Rashi's huppe and the Talmudic hodo kaput (bound glory)

Hoopoe (Upupa epops). Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 20 עֲטַלֵּף atalef bat No lexical anchor
Verse
וְאֶת־הָעֲטַלֵּף׃
Leviticus 11:19 · Deuteronomy 14:18
Modern Candidate
Bat (at the lemma level). No Rashi לעז on עטלף itself — Rashi's bat-word appears on tinshemet (Row 14) and the conflict between the two listings is noted there. No verified Talmudic etymology for עטלף in this dataset.
Egyptian fruit bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) at Hai-Bar Yotvata reserve, Israel — one example of the bat group

Egyptian Fruit Bat (Rousettus aegyptiacus) at Hai-Bar Yotvata, Israel. One example of the bat group, not a secure species identification. Photograph via Wikimedia Commons.

↑ Top
Row 21 · family לְמִינָהּ on ayah/dayah Lev 11:14 · Deut 14:13 No lexical anchor (family row)
See ayah/dayah headword row (5) for the Chullin 63b anchor. This row is the structural family-expansion.
Row 22 · family לְמִינוֹ on orev Lev 11:15 · Deut 14:14 Talmudic-anchored
Talmud · Chullin 63a (raven sub-kinds)
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: עוֹרֵב — זֶה עוֹרֵב. אֶת־כׇּל־עוֹרֵב — לְהָבִיא עוֹרֵב הָעֶמֶקִי. לְמִינוֹ — לְהָבִיא עוֹרֵב הַבָּא בְּרָאשֵׁי יוֹנִים.
Row 23 · family לְמִינֵהוּ on netz Lev 11:16 · Deut 14:15 No lexical anchor (family row)
See netz headword row (10) for Rashi's esprevier and the Chullin 63a bar chiriya passage. This row is the structural family-expansion.
Row 24 · family לְמִינָהּ on anafah Lev 11:19 · Deut 14:18 No lexical anchor (family row)
See anafah headword row (18) for Rashi's heron and the Chullin 63a anchor. This row is the structural family-expansion.
End of Part B
Part C · Orders & Ornithology
A Three-Part Study

Orders & Ornithology

The Torah's forbidden birds fall into recognizable ecological groupings. Each group shares observable anatomical patterns.

This section reorganizes the 20 head-terms of Part B by ecological group. It introduces no new source quotations — the verbatim Hebrew, Aramaic, and Old French texts live in Parts A and B.

The birds listed in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14 cluster into ecological groupings that modern observers also recognize — raptors, owls, long-legged waders, corvids, one ground-dwelling bird, one crested insect-eater, and one flying mammal grouped in the Torah's bird list. For readers working through Part B specimen-by-specimen, this section offers a different entry point: the same 20 head-terms reorganized by ecological group.

Within each group, certain anatomical patterns appear consistently. The Four Signs defined in Part Adores, etzba yeseira, zefek, kurkevan niklaf — can be observed across whole groups, not only in individual birds. That is part of why the Sages' signs were derivable from the Torah's list: birds grouped by lifestyle often display similar observable traits.

Order 1

Raptors — hawks, eagles, vultures

Accipitriformes (plus Falconiformes for falcons)

Raptors hunt or scavenge with hooked beaks and powerful taloned feet. Some, like the griffon vulture, feed primarily on carrion; others, like the sparrowhawk, take live prey in flight. Most soar on thermal updrafts or wait motionless before striking. All share the hunting-specific anatomy: hooked beak, strong feet with curved claws, forward-facing eyes for depth perception.

Observed alongside the birds in this group
דּוֹרֵס · dores
commonly observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
not relied on in this guide
זֶפֶק · zefek
varies across the group
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
not relied on in this guide
Caveats
  • Pure scavengers (nesher / griffon vulture, racham / Egyptian vulture) do not hunt live prey in the strict sense; whether they meet Rashi's or Rabbeinu Tam's definition of dores is a substantive question, treated in Part A.
  • Chullin 61b notes that peres and ozniyah each possess one of the four signs, unlike the other listed birds; see Part B for the verbatim passage.
  • The da'ah/ra'ah and ayah/dayah rows are identified by Chullin 63b as one species each; see Part B rows 4 and 5 for the verbatim Talmudic text.
↑ Top
Order 2

Owls

Strigiformes

Owls are nocturnal hunters. Their eyes are forward-facing and exceptionally large for their skull size; asymmetrical ear openings allow them to locate prey by sound alone in total darkness; specialized wing feathers dampen airflow noise in flight. They hunt small mammals, other birds, and insects, swallowing prey whole and later regurgitating indigestible bone and fur as pellets.

Observed alongside the birds in this group
דּוֹרֵס · dores
commonly observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
absent
זֶפֶק · zefek
absent
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
absent
Caveats
  • Rashi groups kos and yanshuf together as an owl-pair in his Old French gloss (chouette / hibou) without specifying internal allocation — see Part B rows 11 and 13.
  • Tinshemet is placed in this section tentatively on the strength of one traditional identification (barn owl); Rashi's own לעז on tinshemet is the bat-word calve soriz, which creates an unresolved tension noted in Part B row 14.
↑ Top
Order 3

Storks and herons — long-legged waders

Ciconiiformes (storks) and Pelecaniformes (herons)

Long-legged waders feed in shallow water, spearing or seizing fish, frogs, small reptiles, and small mammals with dagger-like bills. Storks and herons share the long-legs / long-neck / long-bill body plan but differ in hunting style: herons stand motionless and strike; storks walk and grab more actively.

Birds from Part B in this order
Observed alongside the birds in this group
דּוֹרֵס · dores
predatory feeding observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
absent
זֶפֶק · zefek
absent
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
absent
Caveats
  • These are the only two Part B specimens anchored at Anchored (Rashi + Talmud) confidence via a Rashi Old French gloss (cigogne for chasidah, heron for anafah) plus verbatim Chullin 63a passages.
  • The shalach (Part B row 12) is traditionally placed among fish-catching birds but identified by Rashi and Rav Yehuda behaviorally, not zoologically. It is not placed in this order because its species is genuinely unresolved.
  • Whether the herons' and storks' spear-and-strike feeding maps to dores under any given Rishon's definition is exactly the question Part A presents — this row does not pre-judge it.
↑ Top
Order 4

Ravens, crows, and related corvids

Corvidae (within Passeriformes)

Corvids are omnivorous — they eat seeds, fruit, insects, carrion, and small prey. They are not strict predators; they do not pursue live prey the way a hawk does, and they do not have the hooked beak or curved talons of the Accipitriformes. They are the one songbird family (Passeriformes) in the Torah's list.

Birds from Part B in this order
Observed alongside the birds in this group
דּוֹרֵס · dores
variably observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
present
זֶפֶק · zefek
absent
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
absent
Caveats
  • Corvids possess a hind toe (hallux) that is visibly set apart from the three front toes, which matches one reading of etzba yeseira — but as Part A notes, no verbatim Rashi definition of etzba yeseira was located, so whether corvid foot anatomy satisfies the sign halakhically is not a question this guide answers.
  • Corvid scavenging on carrion is well-observed; whether this counts as dores depends on which definition applies — see Part A Section II (Rashi and Tosafot verbatim).
  • The l'mino expansion is given its own row in Part B per the Talmud's derivation at Chullin 63a (sub-kinds: valley raven, raven-with-dove-like-heads).
↑ Top
Order 5

Hoopoe

Upupiformes (sometimes Bucerotiformes)

The hoopoe is a ground-probing insectivore. It walks on short legs, uses its long curved bill to extract insects, grubs, and small reptiles from soil and crevices, and displays a fan-shaped erectable crest. It is the only species in its order found in the Levant.

Birds from Part B in this order
Observed alongside the birds in this group
דּוֹרֵס · dores
not observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
present
זֶפֶק · zefek
absent
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
absent
Caveats
  • Duchifat is one of the four Anchored (Rashi + Talmud) rows in Part B. Rashi's לעז (huppe, likely) and the Talmudic הודו כפות ("its glory is bound," i.e. the crest) converge cleanly on this species.
  • It is also one of the few Torah birds that is not in any sense a predator. Its inclusion in the Torah's forbidden list is explicit; this guide does not infer a practical ruling from the signs.
↑ Top
Order 6

Ostrich

Struthioniformes (ratites)

Ratites are large flightless birds with reduced wing structures and powerful legs. The ostrich is the largest living bird. It is a ground-running omnivore, feeding on seeds, plants, and occasional small animals.

Birds from Part B in this order
Observed alongside the birds in this group
דּוֹרֵס · dores
not observed
אֶצְבַּע יְתֵרָה · etzba yeseira
absent
זֶפֶק · zefek
absent
קֻרְקְבָן נִקְלָף · kurkevan niklaf
present
Caveats
  • This is the classic case of signs vs. explicit prohibition. The ostrich has a peelable gizzard — a positive sign — yet the Torah names it explicitly as forbidden. Part A Section III ("Why Mesorah Decides") discusses how the halakhic system treats signs as necessary but not sufficient; bat ha-ya'anah is the most cited example.
  • Other ratites (emu, rhea, cassowary) were not known in the biblical Levant. Whether they are included in the Torah's prohibition is a halakhic question not addressed in this guide.
↑ Top
Order 7

Bats

Chiroptera (mammal order, not bird)

Bats are the only mammals capable of true powered flight. Most species in the Levant feed on insects caught in flight; the Egyptian fruit bat (common in Israel) feeds on dates, figs, and other fruit. They roost in caves, hollow trees, or abandoned structures and are active at dusk and night.

The Torah lists atalef among the flying creatures in this passage. This guide follows the verse's placement without making a zoological claim from it.

Birds from Part B in this order
Note on the Four Signs for this group

The Four Signs were stated by the Sages for birds. Bats do not possess avian anatomy, and the signs do not apply in the structural way they do for the other orders in this section. The atalef is forbidden by the Torah's explicit listing (Leviticus 11:19), which does not depend on the signs.

Caveats
  • Rashi's לעז for tinshemet (Part B row 14) is calve soriz = bat. This creates a structural question the document does not resolve: if tinshemet is a bat, what is atalef? The question is flagged in Part B and not re-argued here.
↑ Top

Closing

Across seven groupings, the Torah's forbidden birds cluster into lifestyles. Predators (Accipitriformes, Strigiformes, Ciconiiformes) share the absence of the positive signs and commonly display predatory feeding. Scavengers and omnivores (Corvidae, part of the vulture group) fall between. The ground-runners and crested insect-eaters (Struthioniformes, Upupiformes) have their own patterns. The atalef stands alone in the Torah's grouping on the strength of flight.

The Four Signs can be viewed alongside these ecological groupings, but this section does not derive halakhic conclusions from that comparison. The operative rules are in Part A, and the verified per-bird analysis is in Part B.